A corporation files a patent infringement action against a manufacturer for a shoe design. What must the corporation demonstrate for the motion to be granted?

In a patent infringement action, the corporation must demonstrate good cause for production of evidence to support its claims against the manufacturer. Good cause typically refers to a legitimate or sufficient reason to request the production of specific evidence from the opposing party. In patent cases, this often includes demonstrating the need for documents, recordings, or other evidence that might support the assertion of infringement.

This element is critical because, without establishing good cause, the corporation may not be able to gain access to essential evidence that could support its claims regarding the patent's design protection. The other options, while they may play a role in broader aspects of patent litigation, do not directly pertain to what needs to be established for a motion regarding evidence production to be successful in this context. For instance, evidence of prior art is relevant for assessing the validity of the patent itself; the manufacturer's financial status might be considered during a damage assessment but is not necessary for the initial motion regarding evidence; and claims of public interest, while important in some cases, do not directly relate to the demonstration required for producing evidence in an infringement action.