A driver from State A's Western District is involved in a collision in State B's Northern District. Where does jurisdiction likely belong?

In this scenario, jurisdiction likely belongs in State B. Jurisdiction in a civil case typically depends on where the event giving rise to the claim occurred, which in this case is the collision that happened in State B's Northern District. Since the incident took place in that district, State B has a strong claim to personal jurisdiction over the driver from State A.

State B’s courts would have the authority to hear the case because the collision occurred within its geographic boundaries, fulfilling the requirement for personal jurisdiction based on the occurrence of events within the state. Furthermore, the defendant's activities (e.g., driving in State B and being involved in a collision there) would allow the injured party to sue in State B.

While it is possible for State A to have jurisdiction as well (if the driver has sufficient contacts with State A), the primary jurisdiction for this particular case rests in the state where the accident happened, thus making State B the appropriate choice. It’s important to note that federal jurisdiction wouldn't be applicable here simply based on the facts provided, as there’s no indication of federal law being involved or diversity of citizenship issues.