In a negligence trial, what must occur before the close of evidence regarding jury instructions?

In a negligence trial, before the close of evidence, it is crucial for the defendant to make any objections to the jury instructions that are proposed by the court. This is important because failure to object at this stage can lead to a waiver of the right to challenge the instructions later on appeal.

Jury instructions outline the legal standards that the jury must apply when deliberating on a case. If a party believes that the instructions are incorrect or insufficient, they must voice their objections before the evidence is closed and before the jury begins their deliberations. This allows the judge the opportunity to correct or modify the instructions if needed, ensuring that the jury has the proper framework to understand the law as it applies to the facts presented during the trial.

Other options presented do not adequately capture the necessity of preserving a party’s right to contest jury instructions. A written document might be provided for clarity, but it is not mandatory for the judge to do so before the close of evidence. While agreement between attorneys on instructions can be beneficial, it is not a prerequisite for the process to continue. Additionally, a jury requesting clarification does not come into play until after they are deliberating on the case, which is beyond the close of evidence. Therefore, the requirement for the defendant