What is a potential consequence of having one party deposed multiple times during a case?

Having one party deposed multiple times during a case can indeed lead to various issues, with one significant consequence being the potential burden on the judicial process. When a party is deposed repeatedly, it may create inefficiencies, consume substantial time and resources, and potentially hinder the case's progression. The judicial system aims for resolution in a timely and efficient manner, and excessive depositions can detract from this goal, leading to delays not only for the parties involved but also impacting the court's calendar and other cases awaiting resolution.

While other options highlight relevant points about depositions, they do not capture the overarching issue of efficiency and resource allocation in the judicial system. For example, contradictory testimonies, while a concern, stem from the nature of the depositions themselves and may not inherently result from the fact of multiple depositions alone. Similarly, while repeated depositions can indeed allow for scrutiny of claims, this may not always translate to a positive outcome for the judicial process as a whole. Lastly, depositions are generally legal in federal court, so that option does not accurately reflect the rules governing such proceedings.