What is the outcome of a diversity action brought by a customer against a company in federal court when seeking an injunction?

In a diversity action where a customer seeks an injunction against a company in federal court, the primary consideration is whether the court has the proper jurisdiction to hear the case. In this scenario, the correct outcome would involve the enforcement of the injunction if the customer's request meets the legal standards for such relief.

Federal courts have jurisdiction over diversity cases when the parties are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. If these conditions are met, the court will evaluate the merits of the injunction request based on the factors such as irreparable harm, likelihood of success on the merits, balance of equities, and public interest. If the customer successfully demonstrates a sufficient basis for the injunction, the court can enforce it.

The other options relate to different aspects of legal procedures. The denial of damages does not apply here if only an injunction is sought, mediation is not a requirement for this type of relief unless mandated by a court or agreed to by the parties, and jurisdiction is only an issue if the diversity requirements are not satisfied. Since the correct choice involves the enforcement of the injunction based on the established jurisdiction and legal standards, it stands as the appropriate answer.