What is the primary responsibility of the plaintiff in case of a motion for summary judgment?

In a motion for summary judgment, the primary responsibility of the plaintiff is to establish that there is indeed a genuine issue of material fact that warrants a trial. This means that the plaintiff must present evidence suggesting that key facts related to the case are in dispute and that these disputes are significant enough that a jury or judge should evaluate them.

The plaintiff's burden in this context is crucial because a motion for summary judgment is intended to resolve cases without the need for a trial when there are no significant factual disputes. If the plaintiff can successfully demonstrate that there are genuine issues of material fact, the court will deny the motion for summary judgment, thus allowing the case to proceed to trial where these issues can be fully examined.

To clarify why other options are not the primary responsibility in this scenario: showing that the defendant acted in bad faith refers to a specific legal standard that may apply in certain cases but is not the general requirement at this stage. Arguing that evidence is insufficient for trial is typically the defendant's position in response to a plaintiff's claims. Finally, while complying with procedural requirements is important for both parties in litigation, it does not specifically address the burden placed on the plaintiff in a motion for summary judgment. The focus for the plaintiff revolves around the