What is the rationale for allowing a woman from State A to sue a pharmaceutical company in State B?

The rationale for allowing a woman from State A to sue a pharmaceutical company in State B primarily hinges on personal jurisdiction, which is crucial in determining where a lawsuit can be filed. For a court in one state to hear a case against a defendant from another state, it must establish personal jurisdiction over that defendant.

In this scenario, if the pharmaceutical company conducts business in State B, sells its products there, or has other sufficient contacts or activities within the jurisdiction, then the courts in State B can exercise personal jurisdiction over the company. This principle arises from the Due Process Clause, which ensures that a defendant has fair notice of the litigation and an opportunity to defend against it in a forum that is reasonable under the circumstances.

While the right to a full hearing on her case is important to ensure justice and fair treatment in the judicial system, the fundamental reason for enabling her to initiate the lawsuit is that the court in State B has the necessary personal jurisdiction to hear her claims against the pharmaceutical company. This allows the court to adjudicate the matter fairly, considering all relevant facts and evidence presented by both parties.