What may a judge do in relation to a jury's answers?

A judge has the authority to apply the law based on the jury's answers when delivering a judgment. This action maintains the principle of the jury's role in weighing evidence and determining the facts of the case. By entering a judgment that is consistent with the jury's findings, the judge respects the jury's function as fact-finders while still ensuring that the legal standards and requirements are properly applied.

This process allows the jury's decision to inform the legal conclusions without undermining the role of the judge in overseeing the application of the law. Thus, the judge constructs a judgment that aligns with the jury's determinations, reflecting the collaborative but distinct roles of the jury and the judge within the trial process.

In contrast, other options do not accurately represent the appropriate judicial response to a jury's answers. For instance, entering a judgment contrary to the jury's findings would undermine the jury's role and potentially violate the right to a jury trial. Ignoring the jury's answers altogether would negate the significance of the jury's work. Invalidation of the jury’s findings and calling for a mistrial is generally reserved for situations of significant procedural error or misconduct, rather than a matter of simple disagreement with the jury’s conclusions.