What must a buyer's attorney show after unsuccessfully attempting to settle a federal civil action?

In the context of a buyer's attorney attempting to settle a federal civil action, demonstrating "good cause for timely service" is essential after unsuccessful settlement efforts. This requirement ensures that the attorney has acted diligently and reasonably in pursuing the case. The concept of "timely service" refers to the need to serve the defendant with the complaint and summons within a certain time frame as dictated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If settlement attempts fail, the attorney must show good cause to justify any delays in proceeding with the case. This might involve explaining efforts made to negotiate and settle the case before moving forward with formal litigation, which can include providing details of communications, proposals, and any obstacles encountered that might have contributed to delays.

While proof of liability against the seller is important for the underlying case, it is not a requirement that an attorney must show after unsuccessful settlement negotiations. Similarly, demonstrating a lack of prior negotiations or strict compliance with local court rules may be relevant in different contexts, but they do not directly address the requirement for justifying the progression of the case following failed settlement attempts.