What results from a disturber's claim that is barred by summary judgment?

In the context of civil procedure, when a claim is barred by summary judgment, it indicates that the court has determined there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This usually results in the dismissal of that particular claim or action by the court. Essentially, the court evaluates the evidence presented and decides that the circumstances do not warrant a trial since the legal criteria for the claim have not been met.

When summary judgment is granted, it means that the case cannot proceed further on those specific claims because the legal standards have not been satisfied. Thus, the claim is dismissed, preventing the parties from further pursuit of that issue in the same court without addressing the specific shortcomings identified by the judge.

The other options don't accurately reflect the outcome of a summary judgment ruling. Refilling the case is not an automatic requirement resulting from summary judgment; it depends on the specific circumstances and whether any claims remain viable. A settlement agreement typically occurs through negotiation among the parties, not directly as a result of summary judgment. Lastly, while an appeal might be possible, it does not directly result from the summary judgment itself but depends on the specific procedural posture and findings of the court. Therefore, dismissing the