What type of legal action did the restaurant owner pursue against the supplier?

The restaurant owner pursued a breach of contract and trademark infringement action against the supplier because these types of claims are commonly relevant in situations involving disputes over goods or services provided under a contractual agreement. In a breach of contract claim, the restaurant owner asserts that the supplier failed to fulfill their obligations as outlined in the contract, which might include delivery of food products, adherence to quality standards, or timely supply.

Trademark infringement, on the other hand, is typically invoked when there is an unauthorized use of a trademark that causes confusion about the source of goods or services. If the supplier used a similar mark or misrepresented their products in a way that infringed upon the restaurant's trademarks, the restaurant owner would have valid grounds to include this claim.

The other options, while they may represent legitimate legal actions, do not directly apply to the context implied by the question. Negligence claims focus on personal injury or property damage due to someone's failure to act with reasonable care, which doesn't seem relevant here. A personal injury lawsuit is primarily concerned with injuries to individuals rather than contractual relationships. Lastly, a partner dispute involves conflicts between business partners, which again doesn't align with a supplier relationship. Thus, the combination of breach of contract and trademark infringement provides a comprehensive basis for