What was one major issue at stake in the case involving the farm employee and the pesticide companies?

One major issue at stake in the case involving the farm employee and the pesticide companies is the establishment of liability principles. This revolves around determining the responsibility of the pesticide companies for any harm caused to the farm employee as a result of pesticide exposure. In tort law, establishing liability involves examining whether the companies acted negligently, if the products were defective, or whether the companies failed to provide adequate warnings about the dangers of their products.

The case likely focused on how the principles of liability apply, including concepts such as strict liability for defective products or negligence in providing safe working conditions. By addressing these principles, the court would clarify whether the farm employee could hold the pesticide companies legally accountable for their injuries.

The other options, while relevant in some contexts, do not represent the primary legal issue in this scenario. Trade secrets typically involve intellectual property, filing deadlines relate to procedural requirements, and jurisdictional authority touches on the power of courts to hear certain cases, which are not central to the liability assessment in this situation.