What was the court's ruling regarding the pedestrian's lawsuit after being struck by a truck?

The court's ruling allowing the pedestrian's lawsuit signifies that the complaint presented sufficient facts to indicate a plausible claim for relief. In civil procedure, a complaint must state a claim that is plausible on its face, which means the allegations must suggest that the plaintiff is entitled to relief based on the facts presented. This requirement ensures that a defendant is not burdened with a lawsuit that lacks merit or foundational support.

In this scenario, if the pedestrian's complaint includes details such as the circumstances of the incident, the actions of the truck driver, and any relevant violations of traffic laws or negligence, it likely meets the standard for plausibility. The court recognizing this allows the case to proceed, giving the plaintiff an opportunity to present evidence and further substantiate their claims during the litigation process.

Other options suggest lack of evidence, insufficient grounds, or an out-of-court settlement, indicating outcomes that would not enable the lawsuit to progress. The decision to allow the complaint to stand emphasizes the importance of providing a sufficient factual basis to warrant legal relief, which is fundamental in dispute resolution in the civil legal system.