What was the federal court's response to the executive's lawsuit against her employer regarding gender discrimination?

The selection is based on the court's ability to assert subject-matter jurisdiction over the case. In cases of employment discrimination, particularly those arising under federal statutes like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, federal courts generally have jurisdiction to hear such disputes. If an executive files a lawsuit alleging gender discrimination, the federal court will typically first assess its subject-matter jurisdiction. Given that federal statutes often govern these claims and provide a pathway for litigating issues of discrimination, a federal court would likely deny a motion to dismiss based on subject-matter jurisdiction.

This option suggests that the court is prepared to hear the evidence and determine whether the claims of discrimination are substantiated, as federal law sets specific standards for evaluating such allegations. The remaining choices, which involve lack of evidence, procedural errors, or remanding to state court, do not accurately reflect the scenario where jurisdiction is established and the case warrants proceeding in a federal court setting. Thus, acknowledging the court's jurisdiction aligns with the principles of civil procedure, affirming the importance of federal jurisdiction in adjudicating civil rights violations like gender discrimination.