What was the outcome of the plaintiff's class action against the grocery store chain regarding accessibility?

The remedy sought being primarily equitable indicates that the plaintiffs aimed to obtain a court order to enforce accessibility standards rather than financial compensation. In class action cases focused on issues like accessibility, it is common for plaintiffs to seek adjustments to policies, practices, or physical locations to comply with relevant laws, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act. These equitable remedies often include injunctions requiring the grocery store chain to make necessary modifications to ensure accessibility for individuals with disabilities.

This approach highlights how class actions can serve to enforce compliance and promote systemic change rather than simply compensating individuals for past harms. By focusing on equitable relief, the plaintiffs intended to address and rectify ongoing violations affecting the entire class, thus underscoring the social justice aspect of such lawsuits. Other options may not apply here—dismissal at the preliminary stage implies the case never progressed, monetary caps on damages focus on limiting financial awards, and immediate liability suggests a straightforward fault finding without consideration of broader remedies.