Which of the following is a primary concern of federal courts in diversity actions?

In diversity jurisdiction cases, federal courts primarily focus on ensuring consistency with state laws. This principle is rooted in the concern that parties from different states should not be unfairly prejudiced because they are in federal court rather than a state court. The idea is to provide a fair and impartial forum that is in alignment with the laws of the state where the dispute originates.

To maintain this consistency, federal courts often apply the substantive law of the states, including statutes and state court decisions, in diversity cases. This helps to prevent disparities in outcomes based solely on whether a case is tried in federal or state court, ultimately promoting fairness and stability in the legal system.

Therefore, the emphasis on consistency with state laws is a fundamental aspect of how federal courts handle diversity actions, as it seeks to honor the legal standards and expectations established by the state where the litigation arises.