Why was the foreign woman's wrongful discharge action found to be appropriate in the foreign country?

The foreign woman's wrongful discharge action was found to be appropriate in the foreign country primarily due to the fact that the discharge occurred there, establishing that it was the correct forum for the case. The locus of the wrongful discharge event is a significant factor in determining jurisdiction because it impacts where the relevant legal standards and practices apply.

When an employee is terminated in a specific jurisdiction, that jurisdiction typically has a vested interest in adjudicating disputes related to employment law, as it will be more familiar with the relevant statutes, workplace norms, and precedents governing such matters. Additionally, local courts can provide the most appropriate context for cases involving local employment relationships, effectively balancing the rights of employees and employers under the governing laws of that country.

While the location of the employer's main office, the employee's residence, and the location of evidence can also be factors in jurisdictional determinations, the actual location of the discharge often carries more weight in establishing the most relevant legal context for the case. Thus, the fact that the misconduct leading to the claim occurred in the foreign country directly supports why that jurisdiction was appropriate to hear the wrongful discharge action.