Why was the woman's purchase of the luxury motorhome not actionable against the dealership?

The woman's purchase of the luxury motorhome is not actionable against the dealership primarily because the first action was dismissed without prejudice. A dismissal without prejudice means that the case can potentially be refiled in the future, but that the initial legal action was not conclusively resolved. This type of dismissal does not constitute a final determination on the merits of the case, which means there is no binding effect preventing the parties from pursuing further negotiations or actions. Therefore, any claims related to the purchase that were part of that action could still be brought up again if circumstances changed.

In contrast, factors such as failure to sign a purchase agreement, making incomplete payments, or issues regarding delivery are more specific conditions that might affect the validity or enforceability of a contract but do not themselves eliminate the possibility of pursuing a claim in the event that other issues have not yet been resolved. The status of the initial legal action is critical here, as it creates the context within which the dealership's potential liability would be assessed.